How Many Times Year Is There Going To Be Full
how many times year is there going to be full
A Canadian View: Obamas Cynical Pipeline Politics | Viewpoints | Opinion
VANCOUVER, British ColumbiaWhen U.S. President Barack Obama was running for president of the United States, he made a bold promise. If Im president, Im immediately going to direct the full resources of the federal government, and the full energy of the private sector, to a single overarching goal, he said. In 10 years time, we are going to eliminate the need for oil from the entire Middle East and Venezuela.
Big Time Break UpUndemocratic and brutal regimes in the Middle East, Africa, and South America are propped up every year by billions of dollars of U.S. funds traded for oil.
Learn more
Obama has had four years to make good on that promise. Hes not even close. And his decision Jan. 18 to deny permission for a new pipeline that would replace oil from those OPEC countries with Canadian oil, indicates that he didnt actually mean what he said. As the famed American energy investor T. Boone Pickens put it after the White House announced its veto on the Keystone XL pipeline, We can kiss another chance at energy security goodbye. We must really like OPEC oil.
Insult to Canadians
Obamas insulting repudiation of Canadian oil, in favor of crude from conflict countries, like Saudi Arabia and Venezuela, should outrage Americans every bit as much as it will surely gall Canadians.
For decades, Americans have agonized over the fact that their reliance on energy sources from unstable regimes has frustrated their foreign policy goals. Undemocratic and brutal regimes in the Middle East, Africa, and South Americadictators and tyrants that offend and antagonize Washingtonare propped up every year by billions of dollars of U.S. funds traded for oil that, until recently, the United States could not get in sufficient quantities anywhere else.
This president was lucky enough to be the American leader finally presented with an alternative: The Keystone XL pipeline would have delivered just about enough ethical Canadian oil to U.S. refineries to replace every drop of Saudi Arabian imports. Or Venezuelan imports.
House of the Waiting FamilyLearn more
Either way, Americans finally had an opportunity to make a huge shift away from their reliance on illiberal conflict oil, and towards a greater and more secure supply of oil produced in a peaceful country, upholding only the highest standards for minority rights, womens rights, workers rights, and the environment.
Appallingly, Obama took a pass. The pipeline was determined not to serve the national interest, according to the U.S. governments press release. Three years ago, Obama understood that more Canadian oil, and less OPEC oil, was exactly what was in Americas national interest.
What changed, in the meantime, were the political fortunes of Obama himself. Everyone sees this for exactly what it is: cynical politics. Having failed to impress swing voters with his economic performance, the president has been forced to capitulate to the extreme environmentalist lobby so necessary, now, to fund and redeem his re-election bid. And so, the president has taken up their claims that Keystone XL was a risk to the vast Ogallala Aquifer.
In fact, Obamas own State Departments environmental assessment found that the pipeline was acceptably safe and that, with the right precautions in place, there would be no significant impacts to most resources along the proposed project corridor. That aquifer, a source of water for the eight states atop it, is already crisscrossed by thousands of miles of oil and gas pipelinesall of them older and frequently built to lower safety standards than Keystone XL.
This was not about the Ogallala. Nor was it about Americas carbon footprint: Much of Venezuelas oil is already higher in its emissions-intensity than oil from Canadas oil sands, and so, adding more of our oil to the U.S. mix, as the Council on Foreign Relations has pointed out, would have been no more than a small fraction of 1 per cent more added to total American carbon emissions.
At the Mercy of Extremists
Unfortunately, just as Americans have been at the mercy of unsavory OPEC oil suppliers for generations, this president is at the mercy of powerful extremists who want to cripple Canadas oil sandsthe environmentalists favorite scapegoatby blocking all of our potential export routes.
Theyre also at work in British Columbia right now, where lobbyists funded by foreign radicals, as Canadas natural resource minister calls them, are working to obstruct and sabotage the hearings into the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline that would open up oil sands exports to a world beyond the United States.
Unlike Keystone XL, the Northern Gateway pipeline is an all-Canadian affair, running from Alberta to the B.C. coast, crossing no international boundaries. It is our decision alone whether to approve that pipeline, not that of a foreign government, or foreign interest groups.
The White House has left the door open for TransCanada, the company behind Keystone XL, to re-apply again with a new proposed route, and getting more of Canadas ethical, secure oil to the majority of Americans who want it is still a worthwhile goal.
But Obamas self-serving decision should remind Canadians of the dangerous risks of relying on just one single customer, and toughen our resolve to build more pipelines, like Northern Gateway, to reach more customers. We must make sure that our national ambitions and our prosperity arent also left at someone elses mercy.Kathryn Marshall is a columnist for 24 Hours Vancouver and a blogger and a commentator on politics and current affairs. She is the spokesperson forEthicalOil.org, a grassroots advocacy organization that encourages people, businesses and governments to choose Ethical Oil from Canada and other liberal democracies.
0 コメント:
コメントを投稿